Minutes
of Meeting, September
18-19, 2007
The Council on Graduate
Medical Education convened 8:30 a.m. on both September 18 and 19,
2007 at the Crowne Plaza, Silver Spring.
Members Present
Russell G. Robertson,
M.D., Chair
Joseph Hobbs, M.D., Member
Mark A. Kelly, M.D., Member
Rebecca M. Minter, M.D., Member
Angela D. Nossett, M.S., Member
Robert L. Phillips, Jr., M.D., M.S.P.H., Vice Chair
Kendall Reed, D.O., F.A.C.S., Member
Earl J. Reisdorff, M.D., Member
Vicki L. Seltzer, M.D., Member
Jason C. Shu, M.D., Member
William L. Thomas, M.D., F.A.C.P., Member
Leana S. Wen, M.S., B.S., Member
Barbara J, Chang, M.D., M.A., Designee of the Department of Veterans
Affairs
Tzvi M. Hefter, Designee of the Administrator, Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services, DHHS
Members Absent
Denise Cora-Bramble,
M.D., M.B.A, Member
Thomas J. Nasca, M.D., M.A.C.P., Member
Anand Parekh, M.D., Designee of the Assistant Secretary for Health,
DHHS
Staff
Elizabeth Duke,
Administrator, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
Marsha Brand, Ph.D., Director, Bureau of Health Professions (BHPr)
Marilyn Biviano, Ph.D., Director, Division of Medicine and Dentistry,
BHPr
Jerald M. Katzoff, Executive Secretary
Welcome
Dr. Robertson,
Chair, welcomed the COGME members
Opening Remarks
Elizabeth Duke,
Administrator, Health Resources and Services Administration, and Marsha
Brand, Ph.D., Director, Bureau of Health Professions, each gave welcoming
remarks. Dr. Duke introduced Dr. Brand as the recently appointed Bureau
director. Both noted the importance of the Council’s recent work
and the emerging recommendations of the two reports under development.
In describing current activities of both HRSA and BHPr, both Drs.
Duke and Brand noted how the Council’s work has complemented the Agency’s
and Bureau’s activities and goals over the past several years.
Presentations to the
Council (September 18)
Following Mr.
Katzoff’s Executive Secretary’s report, Dr. Steven Shannon, President
and CEO of the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine,
and Dr. Paul Rockey, Director of Undergraduate and Graduate Medical
Education of the American Medical Association each presented to the
Council their views and comments on the two draft reports of the Council,
Enhancing GME Flexibility and New Paradigms for Physician
Training in Improving Access to Healthcare. While both provided
suggestions for the reports’ enhancements, they expressed support
and approval for each of the reports and for virtually all of the
reports’ recommendations. They applauded the Council for its work,
and expressed support for increased resources and staff for the council
to further enhance the quality of its products.
Following the
presentations and subsequent discussion, Dr. Robertson and Mr. Katzoff
introduced Mr. Bryan Johnson and his colleague Dr. David Newman, recently
commissioned to provide editorial and writing services to enhance
the two drafts produced by the COGME members. The editors described
the edits that they had made to the drafts over the five weeks that
had elapsed since their commission.
Breakout of Council
Members into Two Writing Groups
After lunch, the
two writing groups convened to further discuss the revisions to be
made on each of their two reports in light of the discussions held
earlier that day and in light of all of the external comments received
on the two drafts.
Report to Council on
Draft Recommendations of the Two Reports
Following the
breakout sessions, Drs. Reisdorff and Chang, chairs of each writing
group reported to the plenary meeting on the groups’ decisions of
any changes to be made to the drafts and their recommendations
(Note that what
follows are the revised draft recommendations contained in the most
recent versions of the two draft reports prepared by Mr. Bryan Johnson
and his colleague Dr. David Newman dated September 30 following the
plenary session).
New Paradigms
for Physician Training Writing Group
- Existing programs
should be expanded and new models of training developed that focus
on delivering care in areas of high medical need. This should include
an incentive-based, non-mandatory structure that encourages medical
school and residency graduates to serve in such practice settings.
- Federal loan
programs through the National Health Service Corps (NHSC), the Department
of Defense, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and state-based
loan repayment programs should be enlarged to increase the number
of physicians serving in underserved areas.
- Incentives
should be created that encourage medical schools to recruit and
prepare physicians for clinical practice in underserved areas.
- A National
Medical School (or system of medical schools)—the “United States
Public Health Medical College” (USPHMC)—should be established. The
USPHMC would be unique in its emphasis on service, public health
issues, epidemiology, and emergency preparedness and response.
- Funding targeted
for physician training that creates a clinical physician workforce
to serve populations in areas of limited access to medical care
should be increased. For example, reinvigoration of Title VII funding
should be considered.
Graduate Medical
Education Flexibility Writing Group
Recommendation
1: Align GME with future healthcare needs
- Increase funded
GME positions by a minimum of 15%, directing support to innovative
training models which address community needs and which reflect
emerging, evolving, and contemporary models of healthcare delivery.
Recommendation
2: Broaden the definition of “training venue” (beyond traditional
training sites)
- Decentralize
training sites
- Create flexibility
within the system of GME which allows for new training venues while
enhancing the quality of training for residents.
Recommendation
3: Remove regulatory barriers limiting flexible GME training
programs and training venues
- Revise current
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) rules that restrict
the application of Medicare GME funds to limited sites of care
- Use CMS's demonstration
authority to fund innovative GME projects with the goal of preparing
the next generation of physicians to achieve identified quality
and patient safety outcomes by promoting training venues that follow
the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) model of care delivery
- Assess and
rewrite statutes and regulations that constrain flexible GME policies
to respond to emergency situations and situations involving institutional
and program closure.
Recommendation
4: Make accountability for the public’s health the driving force
for graduate medical education (GME)
- Develop mechanisms
by which local, regional or national groups can determine workforce
needs, assign accountability, allocate funding, and develop innovative
models of training which meet the needs of the community and of
trainees
- Link continued
funding to meeting pre-determined performance goals
- Alter Title
VII in order to revitalize support for graduate medical education.
Presentations to the
Council (September 18)
On the morning
of September 19, Dr. Fitzhugh Mullan, Murdock Head Professor of Medicine
and Health Policy at the George Washington University, presented to
the Council. He described a two year, $750,000 study awarded to the
University from the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation. Directed by Dr. Mullan,
the study, titled “The Medical Education Futures Study,” will examine
medical education and training in Primary Care and Generalism, enrollment
of minorities into medical schools, and the geographic distribution
of physicians. The study will include analysis of past legislative
and education initiatives, current expansion activities, and institutional,
state, and local policies pertinent to the social mission of medical
education.
Following this
presentation and discussion was a panel presentation on the roles
and activities of the Bureau of Health Profession’s three other advisory
committees. Presenting were Dr. Joseph Leming, past chair of the
Advisory Committee on Primary Care Medicine and Dentistry, Dr. Hugh
Bonner, Vice Chair of the Advisory Committee on Interdisciplinary,
Community-Based Linkages, and Dr. Annette Debisette, Chair of the
National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice.
Included in the
presentations and discussions was the recommendation initially put
forth by the Advisory Committee on Primary Care Medicine and Dentistry
for HRSA to convene a collaborative conference in the Spring of 2008
of the four Advisory committees to align work products along themes
common to each of the groups.
In the late morning
was a presentation by Tim Henderson, Acting Deputy Director of the
Center for Health Policy Research and Studies at George Mason University.
Mr. Henderson presented on recent and ongoing activities within states
on medical education financing and physician workforce and GME planning.
Presently, eleven states link their Medicaid payments to health professions
workforce goals, particularly for primary care training. However,
Mr. Henderson could identify only three or four states that have a
comprehensive program to link workforce analytics, GME policy goals,
and GME policy implementation.
Recommendation for Collaborative
Conference
As an outgrowth
of the discussions of the Council concerning the recommendation initially
put forth by the Advisory Committee on Primary Care Medicine and Dentistry
for HRSA to convene a collaborative conference in the Spring of 2008
of the four Advisory committees to align work products along themes
common to each of the groups, the Council approved the following recommendation:
The Council on
Graduate Medical Education recommends that HRSA convene a collaborative
conference of the four Title VII and Title VIII Bureau advisory committees
in the Spring of 2008 for alignment of work products along common
themes such as health professions workforce, health professions training,
access to care, and workforce diversification. The Council asks
the leadership and lead staff of the four advisory committees to dialogue
in advance of the meeting in order to set joint priorities for the
meeting agenda.
Identification of New
Issues for the Council’s Next Report
In discussions
of the last topic of its agenda for the day, to identify an issue
for its next report, the Council agreed on the report’s working theme
or title--The Impact of Reimbursement on Physician Training Choice.
While the focus of the proposed study will be to assess the impact
of payer reimbursement on specialty choice, the proposed project analytics
will include the general pool of influences on specialty training
choice, and will look at factors influencing both the supply of and
demand for GME positions.
The proposed project
is expected to culminate in a “numbered” report to include findings
and policy recommendations.
The Council will
invite collaboration with external groups such as the Institute of
Medicine, the CMS and MedPAC. For the initial development of material,
staff will investigate the use of resources to develop “white papers”
similar to the six papers developed for its two current projects.
In addition, it is expected that “contract writer resources” similar
to that utilized in the final preparation of our existing draft reports
will be available to the Council. These resources may be useful in
working with COGME members to synthesize the papers, provide appropriate
analysis, and draft a report.
Adjournment
The Council adjourned
September 19, at 1:30 P.M.