Search Query Textbox
News & Notices
|
Calendar
|
Employment
|
FAQs
|
Contact Us
Twitter
Facebook
Home
Inside TAM
About Us
Mission Statement
Policies & Procedures
Board of Commissioners
Committees
Executive Committee
Technical Advisory Committee
Citizens' Oversight Committee
Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee
TPLUS Advisory Committee Meetings
State Route 37 Policy Advisory Committee
Annual Reports
Financial Information
Contact Us
Staff Directory
TAM Updates
Meetings: Agendas, Minutes & Reports
TAM Board of Commissioners Meetings
TAM Executive Committee Meetings
TAM BPAC
TPLUS Advisory Committee Meetings
Measure A Citizens' Oversight Committee Meetings
Measure A Technical Advisory Committee Meetings
Marin City CBTP Stakeholder Committee
Canal CBTP Stakeholder Committee
FAQ & Fact Sheet(s)
Glossary of Terms
2016 TAM Commission and Committee Meeting Schedule
TAM Calendar
News
Funding Opportunities
RFP/RFQ Requests
Forms & Publications
Presentations
eNotice Sign Up
Project Updates
Job Openings
Measure B - Vehicle Registration Fee
Transportation Planning
Regional Transportation Plan - Plan Bay Area
Plan Bay Area Update 2017
Plan Bay Area 2013
Vision Document
Public Outreach
TPLUS
Introduction to TPLUS
Vision Statement and Principles
TPLUS TOD/PeD Toolkit
TPLUS Advisory Committee Meetings
Community Based Transportation Plans
Marin City CBTP
Canal CBTP
Novato CBTP
Marin's Bicycle & Pedestrian Plans
Local TLC and HIP Programs
Central Marin Ferry Connection
Central/Southern Marin Transit Study
Streetcar Feasibility Study
Fairfax-San Rafael Transit Corridor Feasibility Study
US 101/East Blithedale Avenue-Tiburon Boulevard Interchange Pedestrian and Bicycle Access Planning Study
Marin Telework Innitiative
Bike Share Feasibility Study
Program & Projects
Marin-Sonoma Narrows
Brookdale Avenue Visual Mitigation
Marin's Bicycle & Pedestrian Plans
Central Marin Ferry Connection
Electric Vehicles
North/South Greenway Gap Closure Project
Congestion Management Program
Ramp Metering in Marin County
Crossing Guards
Green Commute Alternatives
Safe Routes to Schools Programs
Street Smarts Marin
Street Smarts Marin Contacts - Feedback
Street Smarts Marin Program Partners
Street Smarts Marin Community Questionnaire
SR2S Encouragement and Education
SR2S Curriculum
SR2S School Teams and Task Forces
SR2S Program Evaluations
SR2S Contests & Events
Safe Pathways to Schools
Call for Projects
DBE Program
Local Roads
Local Transit
Major Roads & Related Infrastructure
Local Roads and Related Infrastructure
Technical Advisory Committee
Highway 101 Gap Closure
Express Lanes
Westbound I-580/US 101 Connector Project
Measure A
Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Plan
Administrative Code
Strategic Plan
Measure A Citizens' Oversight Committee
Measure A Citizens' Oversight Committee Meetings
Annual Reports
Presentations
FAQ & Fact Sheet(s)
I Want To ...
Contact TAM Staff
Find an Event
Sign-up for E-Notification
View Job Postings
View RFP/RFQ Postings
View Annual Reports
View Other Financial Reports
View Measure A Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Plan and other related Documents
View Meeting Agendas & Minutes
View Programs & Projects
Regional Transportation Plan - Plan Bay Area
Vision Document
TPLUS
Introduction to TPLUS
Vision Statement and Principles
TPLUS TOD/PeD Toolkit
A. Introduction
B. Why TOD/PED in Marin County?
B-1. Marin’s Community Structure
B-2. Current Issues and Trends in Marin
B-3. The Role of Transit in Marin
B-4. Transit-Oriented Development and Pedestrian-Oriented Design in Marin
References
C. Toolkit
Acknowledgements
Glossary of Terms
Appendicies
TPLUS Advisory Committee Meetings
Community Based Transportation Plans
Marin's Bicycle & Pedestrian Plans
Local TLC and HIP Programs
Central Marin Ferry Connection
Central/Southern Marin Transit Study
Fairfax-San Rafael Transit Corridor Feasibility Study
US 101/East Blithedale Avenue-Tiburon Boulevard Interchange Pedestrian and Bicycle Access Planning Study
Marin Telework Innitiative
Bike Share Feasibility Study
Transportation Planning
»
TPLUS
»
TPLUS TOD/PeD Toolkit
»
B. Why TOD/PED in Marin County?
Print
E-mail
B-1. Marin’s Community Structure
Marin’s unique community structure lends both challenges and opportunities to TOD/PeD in the county. Settlement patterns formed here because of the area’s topography and the constraints of rail transportation. Agriculture and a resource-based economy also influenced settlement during the early history of the county. Today’s blend of cities and towns, open spaces, neighborhoods, districts, and corridors is a direct result of these natural and historic influences.
The linear transportation system centered on the county’s rail lines catalyzed development of distinct towns spread along rail lines and roadways. This development pattern is seen today in the Highway 101 corridor from Sausalito to Mill Valley, Corte Madera, Larkspur, San Rafael and Novato, and in the Sir Francis Drake corridor through Ross, San Anselmo, and Fairfax. Development patterns within the towns themselves reflect a clear relationship to the railroad as distribution hubs evolved into towns and cities. Supportive commercial uses and early neighborhoods developed within easy walking distance of rail stations to take advantage of resources brought by and to the train from surrounding rural areas. Today, many of Marin’s densest and most walkable neighborhoods and downtowns remain in these historic locations, as evidenced by the presence of an old station or the proximity of rail right-of-way.
After the Golden Gate Bridge opened in 1937, transition to a more automobile-oriented culture and landscape occurred. Within two years, the Northwest Pacific Railroad and a number of the commuter ferries, which had previously carried many Marin residents to their jobs in San Francisco, were prepared to abandon service, as too many of their former customers now drove to work each day.1 As a result, subsequent development began to prioritize automobile convenience over pedestrian accessibility to train and ferry stations, resulting in development which was more single-use in nature, with residential districts largely separated from commercial uses, and commercial activity concentrated in large office and retail developments. Contrary to this development in Marin’s rail-based areas, such as the local-oriented downtown commercial and residential districts in Sausalito, Tiburon, Mill Valley, Novato, San Anselmo, Larkspur, and the more intensive downtown of San Rafael, a viable framework for increased TOD/PeD still exists in Marin.
Topographic constraints, early orientation around rail, and a strong emphasis on protecting natural resources and scenic settings, have resulted in only 11% of Marin’s land being developed. Approximately 84% of the county is protected open space, watersheds, tidelands, parks, and agricultural land. Most of the remaining 5% of potentially developable land is located within the boundaries of existing communities. The appropriate scale and geographic distribution of new land uses and major transportation infrastructure are key to protecting the county’s environmental assets while maintaining it’s economic vitality and social equity goals.
With 247,289 people in 100,650 households, Marin County is the second smallest of the nine Bay Area counties (ahead of only Napa). While 42 percent of the county population is concentrated in Novato and San Rafael, the remaining 58 percent is spread among Marin’s many smaller towns and communities, complicating planning for efficient transit service and transit-supportive land use patterns.
It is useful for the application of the Toolkit to consider the following place types of various scales, mix of uses, and intensities created by the combination of natural features and historic development patterns described above.
Centers
Centers are areas of similar or related uses, such as downtown main streets, shopping centers, civic centers, or employment centers. Centers often have a strong relationship to the county’s transportation network, so they are accessible to a broad cross section of the community. Centers often contain more active uses and will also define, or have an effect on, the character of neighborhoods around them. Centers can range in scale and intensity from urban downtowns to rural crossroads. Examples of centers in Marin County range from Downtown San Rafael to Point Reyes Station, from Downtown Mill Valley to the Corte Madera Town Center.
Neighborhoods
Neighborhoods are the major building blocks of communities. They consist mainly of a definable collection of residential uses, parks, schools, and small clusters of commercial uses. Neighborhoods tend to be the element of community structure with which we most directly identify. Neighborhoods often have names, neighborhood groups, and clear geographic boundaries associated with them. Neighborhoods can range in intensity from intense urban districts surrounding downtowns to rural housing clusters. Examples of neighborhoods in Marin County include Sleepy Hollow, Marin Village, Ignacio, and others.
Corridors
Corridors are defined by key arterial routes traveling between centers. Corridors often contain similar land uses and activities and are the primary transportation and transit routes in Marin County. Due to the historic development patterns and natural features in Marin County, corridors have an especially prominent role in the specific transportation and land use issues facing the county. Corridors can act as seams that bring together the neighborhoods around them, but can also act as dividers that help to define edges and boundaries in the community. Corridors range in intensity from major urban arterials and primary trunk transit lines to rural highways flanked by farmland. Examples of corridors in Marin County range from Sir Francis Drake Boulevard to Highway 1, from 4th Street in San Rafael to Tiburon Boulevard.
Street Networks
Another critical element of a community’s structure is its overall street network as it provides access to virtually all land uses. As is typical for places with a varied topography such as Marin’s, the street network that accesses uses in confined valleys and on hillsides is branch-like and does not provide many interconnections between parallel routes. In addition, many residential subdivisions also lack interconnected streets in favor of cul-de-sacs and a street pattern that includes relatively few cross-streets.
Last updated: 6/30/2009 1:28:20 PM